Jun 22, 2016


On a lengthy trip (due to checkpoints and alternate roads under occupation) to Ramallah, we had a chance to think and discuss issues like human condition and motivations. Three of us from the Palestine Museum of Natural History were on the way to meet with an official of the UN Development Program and with leadership of an active NGO working on agriculture and the environment. Having a very busy life working 16 hours a day seven days a week basically leaves us little time for reflection.  Back in Bethlehem, I decided to take a bit more time last evening to do more reflection and share some thoughts especially on the state of our world and our role in it. I am sure all of us considered these same issues. There is unprecedented connectivity and access to information and we have richness of nature and enough resources to give everyone on this planet a comfortable life. Yet, we have over 1 billion people living in poverty. Hundreds of millions go hungry. There are murders, terrorism, war, and all other human cruelty to other humans (and to animals and to nature). There is a deterioration of quality of politicians and proportional increase in governmental lies. The global environment is at the breaking point (climate change etc.).  The rich are getting richer and the poor getting poorer. In this man made mayhem, it is not too difficult to understand why cynical right wing politicians can rally people based on “safety/security” concerns (the most powerful human emotion of fear). A friend of mine from a developed country noted that “ We'd better figure out ways to spread some equity around if we want to go on living in a society that is at least semifunctional. .” But the devil is in the detail. We should take the time to think of what world we want and how do we get there.

I am sure that all people like me somehow dream of a better world. If I was a child and drew it, I would draw it as a natural world, beaches, streams, beautiful trees,colorful animals running around, children playing and living in harmony with this “natural ecosystem”. Envisioning such a world of harmony, bliss and happiness is not a utopian silly dream. But not achievting it soon should not be an impediment to (re)thinking our own role in this. First we do need to understand human needs and motivations. The US psychologist Abraham Maslow  proposed that there is a hierarchy of needs in his 1943 paper "A Theory of Human Motivation". We can think of this is a pyramid with these needs from bottom to top of pyramid: physiological needs (food, drink, sex etc), safety, love/belonging, esteem/recognition, and finally self-actualization. Today most people especially in underdeveloped and developing countries are actually at that bottom rung in the pyramid. We in Palestine do not have too many answers since most of our people are still at that subsistence level. It is irritating to see the elites (including Palestinian and Israelis) who have their basic needs met refuse to rise to higher levels and get motivated to do something different to make this a better world. At least they should/could follow Howard Zinn’s advise and get off the train (His book “you can’t be neutral on a moving train” ). By not being part of the problem, humans at least open the possibility of being part of the solution. The next step is of course “trouble-making”: stirring the stagnant waters so to speak.  One of the inspiring groups I know that does this is CodePink whose members put themselves in places challenging political elites and  challenging hypocrisy. The third stage of this process is to envision the alternative and build it. Many people do a great job at separating them-selves from the oppressive and apathetic hords and challenging the oppression. But few go to that third level of building and thus self-actualizing. I ended my book “Sharing the Land of Canaan” (published 2004) with this:

Breaking through the conundrums humans have created is not easy.  It will require transcending a part of our selves that may seem familiar and reassuring.  Learning to live together, while initially uncomfortable, can lead to a new way of thinking.  Joseph Campbell wrote in 1968:  "Today, the walls and towers of the culture-world that then were in the building are dissolving ... But of course, on the other hand, for those who can still contrive to live within the fold of a traditional mythology of some kind, protection is still afforded against the dangers of an individual life; and for many the possibility of adhering in this way to established formulas is a birthright they rightly cherish, since it will contribute meaning and nobility to their unadventured lives, ... and to those for whom such protection seems a prospect worthy of all sacrifice, and orthodox mythology will afford both the patterns and the sentiments of a lifetime of good repute. However, by those to whom such living would be not life, but anticipated death, the circumvallating mountains that to others appear to be of stone are recognized as of the mist of dream, and precisely between their God and Devil, heaven and hell, white and black, the man of heart walks through.  Out beyond those walls, in the uncharted forest night, where the terrible wind of God blows directly on the questing undefended soul, tangled ways may lead to madness. They may also lead, however, as one of the greatest poets of the Middle Ages tells, to 'all those things that go to make heaven and earth.' "(Campbell, Joseph.  1968. The Masks of God: Creative Mythology. Viking Penguin Inc., New York, p. 37.)

It is indeed a journey of awakening at the individual level that is not only spiritual, but also require concrete action to bring true peace and justice to fruition. We Canaanites, who invented the alphabet, domesticated animals and developed agriculture, and made this arid land into a land of milk and honey, surely can do this. An Arab poet wrote "Itha Asha3bu yawman Arad al-7ayata fala budda an Yastijeeb al-qadar. Wala budda lillayal an Yanjaili wala budda li-thulm an yankasir." Roughly translated, it means: If the people one day strive for life, then ultimately destiny will respond and the night will give way and the injustice will be broken. The path to peace is not served by the creation of more states or unjust "fixes" to perceived demographic "problems."  It has to do with justice and implementation of human rights and international law. It requires grass root action to accelerate its arrival but it is the only solution possible in the long term.  We can either remain locked in our old mythological and tribal ways or we can envision a better future and work for it.  The choice is obvious.

But much more needs to be thought of and said and acted upon in these areas. It is after all this search for a meaning of live and our role in it that is at the heart of what makes us human. Let us all resolve to take less time on things like facebook and more time to really look and act deeper. I for one hope to spend more time with intelligent thoughtful people thinking more collectively of these things and acting on them.

A Museum and Institute of Sustainability and Biodiversity at Bethlehem University


  1. r. Qumsiyeh, I understand your entire article and the need to implement basic reforms to reach an equilibrium of supply and demand for basics of human needs and commodities. I understand your quoted material to support your thesis. I have long been exposed to Maslow's hierarchy of needs. The essence of all is to balance human demands with human productivity. That cannot be done by manipulation of rights and privileges against supply and demand. Essential demand is set by nature, not human innovations. Adequate supply is determined by policy, not by availability. A gram of protein in 1776 is equal to a gram of protein in 2016 so long as a gram equals a gram in both times. A calorie of food energy was the same in 1776 as it is in 2016. Human nutrition requires x grams of protein and y calories in any unit of time. Averaged out it is the total divided by the population. That is the basis of supply and demand equilibrium. Interest rates, labor, capital, laws, demand for gold, petroleum, or wheat flour alone cannot regulate this equilibrium for human economy. Science can determine with sufficient accuracy the human nutrition needs in the basic units of protein and calories. That is the basis of money value in a functioning economy, not profit motive, interest rates, or debt. Asset value is an effect upon the supply and demand for those essentials. That means that in order to stimulate basic demand, each person in an economy must receive, without exception, a money flow equal to the demand of his life needs. It cannot be met by charity, business, government, or by individual effort. The universal demand can be met by motivation of production in competition with all other production and all excess production is perishable as a ripe banana. Humans are naturally productive and demand is average. Excess time motivates production and production is controlled by supply and consumption. It is socialist in ideology, but capitalist in action. Control is democratic and correction is natural selection. Human morality is nature and human cooperation is love at all levels of our existence. Love is all essentials met and competition functional. Competition out of control is war and control is peace. Human rights are the essentials, not the luxuries or the power of politics or economics. If you have the time and the connections you could find writers who support my thesis. Thank you for your efforts for Human Rights. Human rights begin with an adequate diet and end with time to reflect and think. All thought is activated by cooperation. Frank Goodman, Sr., Sunrise, Florida

  2. Dear Mazin Qumsiyeh - I always enjoy reading your postings and I do admire your throughout positive approach amidst all the atrocities around all over the world and especially in Palestine. Western politics is just horrible, we do not need to get into details as we know.

    On one of my professional trips to Jerusalem as medical doctor I produced this short video, its is technically not perfect at all, still I wanted to get out the message. Feel free to use this link:
    The text you will find below the video screen on youtube
    My latest conclusions and suggestions I summed up in: A draft towards global peace: A Creative Perspective Beyond The Catastrophes of Modernity - this text you may find here if interested:
    or here:

    This time I contact you feeling invited to do so by your words: I for one hope to spend more time with intelligent thoughtful people thinking more collectively of these things and acting on them.

    all the best, Wolfgang

  3. Thank you for the inspiring words. Solidarity from Ireland, Laurence Davis, University College Cork

  4. What is electronic Indian Visa (India e-Visa)?
    Government of India has launched electronic travel authorisation or eTA for India which allows citizens of 180 countries to travel to India without requiring a physical stamping on the passport. This new type of authorisation is called an eVisa India (or electronic India Visa). It is this electronic India Visa Online that allows foreign visitors to visit India for five major purposes, tourism / recreation short term courses, business, medical visit or conferences. There are further number of sub-categories under each visa type. All foreign travellers are required to hold an India eVisa (India Visa Online application process) or a regular/paper Visa prior to entry into the country as per Indian Government Immigration Authorities.
    for more info visit: indiskt visum